26.12 Piel Parsing Examples

  • Word: גִּדַּלְנוּ
    • The Dagesh in the Gimmel is a Lene (not preceded by a vowel), but the Dagesh in the Dalet is preceded by a vowel that is not a Sheva, so this must be a forte.
      • A Forte in what appears to be \(R_2\) Should get your attention
      • The two questions you should start asking when you see a Forte in \(R_2\):
        • “Is this Piel?”
        • “Is this an assimilated נ1” - if you clearly see \(R_1\) you can rule out this option
    • \(Pre =\) גִּדַּ, distinctly Piel Perfect
    • \(Sufformative =\) נוּ, Perfect 1cp
    • \(Root =\) גדל
    • \(V_S = A\) - We might expect Tsere in the Piel, but then we remember that Piel Perfect takes Patach in 1st/2nd person
    • Result: Piel Perfect 1cp, we made great
  • Word: אֲדַבֶּר
    • Immediately, note the Dagesh in \(R_2\)
      • Your mind should immeadetly be asking, “is this Piel?”
      • Potentially, this could be an assimilated 1-nun verb, but we already have what appear to be three-root letters visible
    • Then remember “Piel-Pael” and note this rhymes with Pael. So without doing much analysis, we’re already pretty sure this is a Piel, non-Perfect.
    • \(Pre =\) אֲדַבּ,
      • We expect \(V_P = ə\) in the Piel; but, as we know, the Aleph takes the Hateph vowel instead of Sheva
      • The Patach+Dagesh+Tsere combination is consistent with Piel non-Perfect
    • \(Sufformative =\) None. With the Aleph preformative, this is I1cs
    • \(Root =\) דבר
    • \(V_S = \bar E\), consistent with Piel (except DP1/2 person)
    • Result: Piel Imperfect 1cs I will speak
  • Word: לַמֵּד
    • The Dagesh Forte in \(R_2\) suggests Piel or assimilated 1-Nun
      • Of the verb examples on this page, this is the only one where a 1-nun might be plausible
        • We have the ל, which is a common prefix to an infinitive construct
        • If there was a verb נמד, we might want to probe this further as a possible ∞, but we don’t know a verb נמד
        • Even if this were a 1נ verb,, the vowels don’t match up
      • We DO know a verb למד though
        • Like in other areas of life, when we have a set of multiple possibilities, the most direct path is often the correct one
      • You also note that the word rhymes with “Pael”, suggesting a “working hypothesis” of Piel, non-perfect
    • \(Pre =\) לַמּ,
    • \(Sufformative =\) none. No preformative, no sufformative could be QP, but the vowels don’t match Qal at all. The vowels do match Piel.
      • This can’t be DP because \(V_1 \not = I\)
      • This can’t be DI because all Imperfects have a preformative
      • This can’t be DPt because DPt begins with מְ
      • DM2ms, D∞, and DA each work
    • \(Root =\) למד
    • \(V_S = \bar E\), consistent with Piel (except Piel Perfect 1/2 person)
    • Result: D(M2ms/∞/A) - Teach! or to teach